jokergreen0220
Kidemli Üye
Kayıt Tarihi: 2017-20-Aralik
Aktif Durum: Pasif
Gönderilenler: 0
|
| Gönderen: 2018-20-Nisan Saat 06:43 | Kayıtlı IP
|
|
|
TORONTO -- Toronto FC finally found a home for Richard
Eckersley on Monday, sending the English fullback to the
New York Red Bulls for a fourth-round pick in the 2017
MLS SuperDraft.
hockey-jersey/">Brian Flynn Jersey . The move, long
expected, was money-related. The MLS Players Union listed
Eckersleys salary last season at US$310,000, second-
highest among the numbers made public for Toronto
players. His number for 2014 was even higher, thanks to a
contract renegotiation last year to help ease the 2013
salary cap burden. Toronto declined comment when asked if
the club was absorbing any of that salary. "As per team
and league policy, we cant disclose terms of the deal," a
Toronto spokesman said. Which sounds like a yes. Toronto
was more interested in ridding itself of Eckersleys wages
than getting something in return, which other clubs knew.
While a fourth-round draft choice is a modest prize --
there are only four rounds in the SuperDraft -- Toronto
GM Tim Bezbatchenko can add it to the draft choices
obtained for the rights to goalie Stefan Frei and
midfielder Bobby Convey, two other players who did not
figure in TFCs future. Eckersley, 24, made 92 appearances
for Toronto over three seasons after joining the club on
loan from English side Burnley FC in April 2011. The loan
became a permanent deal in January 2012. Eckersley
established himself as a starter at right fullback,
filling in at centre back when needed. Signed to a rich
contract by a previous regime, he found himself on the
outs towards the end of last season because of his salary
cap hit. The red-haired Brit was a fan favourite for his
marauding runs and combative style. But manager Ryan
Nelsen used Mark Bloom for the last six games of the
season, electing to keep Eckersley on the sidelines with
his future on the club uncertain. The team recently
signed veteran English fullback Bradley Orr on loan from
Blackburn Rovers. "Weve been really honest with Richard,"
Nelsen said prior to flying to Florida for training camp
Sunday. "Hes given great service to the club. Hes done
really well and its not his fault that a contract was
given that was probably not appropriate." NOTES -- The
Vancouver Whitecaps filled a void at right back by
acquiring Steven Beitashour from the San Jose Earthquakes
for allocation money. Born in California to Iranian
parents, Beitashour holds dual American-Iranian
citizenship and has represented Iran. The Whitecaps also
announced the signing of midfielder Mehdi Ballouchy,
acquired in Stage 2 of the 2013 MLS Re-Entry Draft ...
Former Toronto FC midfielder Maurice Edu has joined the
Philadelphia Union on a one-year loan from Stoke City of
the English Premier League. Edu, who was MLS rookie of
the year in 2007 with Toronto, returns to MLS in a bid to
get more playing time in advance of the World Cup. The
American joins the Union via the leagues allocation
process, which previously was not valuable as a way to
sign designated players. The league has changed that rule
for 2014, saying it reviews roster rules on an annual
basis "and reserves the right to modify them prior to
each season."
hockey-jersey/">Marc Methot Jersey .Y. Islanders
4Winnipeg 5 Dallas 2Nashville 3 Colorado 0San Jose 5
Edmonton 2---AHLProvidence 5 St. Johns 4 (OT)Chicago 6
San Antonio 2---NBACleveland 105 Toronto 101Portland 98
Detroit 86New Orleans 104 New York 93Oklahoma City 114
Milwaukee 101Memphis 114 Dallas 105Miami 103 Phoenix
97Utah 100 San Antonio 96L.
hockey-jersey/">Dan Hamhuis Jersey . The Senators
return from a lengthy layoff caused by Wednesdays attack
on Parliament Hill to host the New Jersey Devils on
Saturday night.
hockey-jersey/">http://www.thedallasstarshockey.com/esa-
lindell-hockey-jersey/ . -- Theres something about
playing on Orlandos floor lately that seems to bring out
the best in the Dallas Mavericks.In the Predators/Habs
game Saturday night, Montreals second, go-ahead goal was
ultimately disallowed after review (I believe the ref
stated that after all four officials determined that the
puck had not crossed the line). Now, correct me if Im
wrong but I saw one official distinctly pointing at the
net indicating a good goal but after an inconclusive
review they overturned the goal. Shouldnt the ruling on
the ice (good goal) stand after an inconclusive review?
Why was this overturned? James Veaudry Pembroke, ON --
Hey Kerry, Youll get a lot of these, but why was the
Montreal goal against Nashville Saturday night
overturned? Eller puts the puck on net and the on ice
ruling from the ref behind the net is a Montreal goal.
After much delay, the same ref announces that after a
review with all on ice officials, the ruling is the puck
never crossed the goal line. How is this possible? Ive
always believed that if the video review is inconclusive,
which it obviously was, then the call on ice stands. How
is the other ref from the blue line supposed to tell if a
puck crosses the line? Let alone be able to overrule the
ref inches away. The ref simply changed his mind after
the play. Is that allowed? Sounds pretty shady to me.
Thanks, Dave -- Hi Kerry! Last night I was bouncing out
of my chair with excitement when the red light came on,
Lars Eller celebrated and the referee pointed indicating
a goal in the third period. Then suddenly the referees
decided to review the play as there was question about
whether the puck had actually crossed the line. After
watching the replays myself, it was unclear whether the
puck made it over the line or not because it was hidden
under Rinnes body. Seeing this, I was all but sure that
the goal had to stand, because from my understanding the
referees needed undeniable evidence to over-turn an on-
ice call. But that wasnt the case. The referee announced
that "The four referees agree that the puck did not enter
the net" which indicated to this viewer that, they too
were unsure but had a chat about it, and I suppose used
their judgment, to deicide the puck had never crossed the
line. What I dont understand is how they can make this
new judgment with inconclusive evidence? Moreover, how a
referee can clearly call a goal a goal, and then change
his opinion moments later? Could you clear up my
confusion with the rules on this matter? Thanks! Rob --
To All Disappointed Habs Fans: Upon further information
gathering from all vantage points on the ice by the
officiating crew, including a seemingly definitive
confirmation from the situation room video review, the
referee on the goal line changed his initial quick
reaction decision and correctly determined that the puck
did not cross the goal line - no goal! At no time do we
see the puck cross the goal line on thiis play.
radulov-hockey-jersey/">Alexander Radulov Jersey.
The official statement found on the Situation Room blog
posting at NHL.com is as follows; “Video review
determined that Montreal Canadiens forward Lars Ellers
shot did not cross the goal line. No goal Montreal.”
(See Situation Room review here. Having witnessed referee
Chris Rooney point to the net to signal a goal I trust it
is the referees announcement that is causing you
confusion (“The call on the ice by the four officials
that the puck did not cross the goal line and that is
confirmed (by video review)…”) and not the correct
final decision that was ultimately rendered. All
confusion would have been eliminated had the announcement
by the referee simply been; “Video review has confirmed
that the puck did not cross the goal line, the initial
call on the ice is overturned - no goal.” Let me explain
the protocol and how the process most likely worked in
this situation. In the event that video review returns an
“inconclusive” verdict the referees are required to
make a decision (communicated with a point into the net
or washout signal) from their vantage point when it
appears the puck has entered the net. Sometimes the
“vantage point” a referee has in that moment is not
always the best one. For this reason, the four officials
on the ice are required to conference and provide input
from their respective vantage points as an added ‘safety
check. This is in addition to video review that takes
place. Through the conference process considerable doubt
must have been created in referee Rooneys mind and caused
him to change his initial reaction to the play. The
obvious answer is the referee needs to see the puck cross
the line before pointing to the net. In real time other
factors can complicate this decision. In fairness on this
play, the referees approach to the net was from the
opposite corner from behind the goal line. This route
caused an obstructed view looking through the net and the
back of Predators sprawled goalie Pekka Rinne. The refs
focus was also split between a penalty that he signaled
to David Legwand for cross-checking Eller just as the
Montreal forward flipped the puck toward Rinne. With
Rinnes body position sprawled deep into the net and
across the goal line, Rooneys gut reaction and instinct
told him the puck had crossed the line from his vantage
point. As required, the ref made his initial decision but
once a consultation took place with the other crew
members Rooney correctly changed his opinion on the play.
It would have been less confusing and more efficient had
the ref not communicated the result of the Officiating
Crews ‘internal process that caused him to change his
initial decision on the play. In the end the right
decision was rendered. Sometimes the less said the
better!
Cheap
Jerseys Online
Jersey
s Wholesale
China Jerseys
Cheap NFL
Jerseys From China
Cheap Jerseys
2020
Wholesale
Authentic Jerseys
Cheap Jerseys
China ' ' '
|
Aktif Konular 
Üye Listesi 
Arama 
Yardım
Kayıt Ol 
Giriş
Gitar-tr.com FORUM : Gitar-tr.com Tanisma Toplantisi !!!
Konu: TORONTO -- Toronto FC finally found a hom
