jokergreen0220
Kidemli Üye
Kayıt Tarihi: 2017-20-Aralik
Aktif Durum: Pasif
Gönderilenler: 0
|
| Gönderen: 2018-10-Nisan Saat 05:20 | Kayıtlı IP
|
|
|
Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule
enforcements or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants
to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.
Friday-Ronnie-Lott-Jersey/">Ronnie Lott Jersey .ca.
Hello, I love reading your column. I have a question on
the Bruins/Columbus game from Saturday. The puck clearly
went out of play in the second period and play continued
on as the on ice officials didnt see the puck go into the
netting and Columbus ended up scoring. Why was this not
reviewed and the time put back on the clock and the goal
not disallowed? Thanks! Cristina I hope all is well! I
was wondering if you could give a little explanation in
to the call, or lack thereof, during the Bruins vs.
Columbus game on Saturday 12/27? The puck clearly went
out of play and hit the protective netting, as it was
described by the announcers it should have been reviewed
at the next whistle and the clock reset to the time the
puck went out of play, the next whistle was a goal by
Columbus, which they deserved, but the commentator made
it seem that there was no way it would stand with the new
rule the NHL implemented in the off season as a result of
the Detroit vs. San Jose game last year. Later it was
clarified by the NHL that the puck needed to go
immediately in the net for that rule to be enforced, who
was right in this situation? Sincerely, Jason in Boston
Cristina and Jason: The Hockey Operations Department is
the exclusive and final authority responsible for
managing everything that takes place on the ice. As
keepers of the game, Hockey Ops extensive range of
authority includes, but is not limited to, conducting
studies to improve the on-ice product, recommendation of
rule changes, provide for player safety and to render all
video review decisions under guidelines issued by the
team General Managers and as approved by the rules
committee. As the NHL puck bounces, we are all forced to
accept their decisions. The expressed inability by the
NHL Situation Room blog to review this play beyond the
scoring of an immediate goal after the puck struck the
struck the spectator netting is beyond just right or
wrong. It exposes a communication and public relations
problem too often created by the NHL that provides
confusion and frustration as opposed to clarity for those
that report the game and for fans. There have been times
that a new rule was implemented in an attempt to manage a
specific situation without due consideration as to how it
might affect or impact other preexisting rules. The
Referees usually pick up any contradictions at training
camp as various scenarios are brought forward in new rule
discussions. The horrible optics and negative impact on
the outcome of the game in Detroit last season
contributed to an expanded and broader discretionary
capability for video review to determine the legitimacy
of all potential goals (e.g. to ensure they are good
hockey goals). In that game, with L.A. leading by one
goal in the dying seconds of regulation time, and the
Wings net empty in favor of an extra attacker, the puck
deflected high onto the spectator netting behind the
Kings net and was undetected by the Officials. The puck
then caroomed off the netting, struck Jonathan Quick on
the back and rolled into the net for the tying goal. The
Wings then went on to win the game in overtime thereby
denying the Kings a point they desperately needed in the
tight Western Conference playoff race. That was surely
not a good hockey goal by any stretch of the imagination.
I have to question whether the one in Columbus the other
night was much better. During the summer months wording
was incorporated into Rule 38.4 (viii) to allow video
review to rule upon this specific situation with regard
to (and I quote), pucks that hit the spectator netting
prior to being directed into the goal. As per the wording
in the rule book and as communicated to Bruins play-by-
play man Jack Edwards and other NHL broadcasters that
attended a pre-season advisory meeting in New York, there
was never a reference to the word immediate or a defined
lapse of time between the puck going out of play (onto
the spectator netting) and a subsequent goal being
scored. It would appear that a change in criteria or
understanding was implemented at some point after the
broadcasters September meeting in New York and following
the publishing of the 2014-15 NHL Rule Book, to only
allow a review if a goal was scored immediately after
hitting the spectator netting and going out of play. It
would also appear that someone forgot to send a memo to
everyone that was affected by this dramatic change in
policy? The next most obvious question is how immediate
must the puck be directed into the net for video review
to disallow the goal and reset the clock? Aside from the
puck deflecting into the net off the goalie (as was the
case with Jonathan Quick) or any other player for that
matter, is a puck off the netting onto a stick and shot
allowable? What about an attacker gaining puck possession
in the corner who subsequently makes a pass into the slot
for a one-timer? Is two or more multiple passes allowed
or is sustained pressure in the end zone by the attacking
team before the puck is directed into the net? These are
way too many variables that create inconsistency through
subjective decisions. Are any of these scenarios more or
less a good hockey goal from each other once it is
determined the puck has exited the playing surface by
striking the spectator netting? The new and specific
wording in 38.4 (viii) contradicts preexisting rule 85.1
(play shall be stopped when the puck hits the spectator
netting unless it goes unnoticed by the on-ice officials,
in which case play shall continue as normal and resulting
play with the puck shall be deemed a legitimate play. I
would suggest that through a common sense application the
new and expanded authority granted to video review in
this very specific situation should take precedent and
override 85.1 since it results in the scoring of a goal
and not just a normal stoppage at some point and time. My
recommendation would be to amend the existing rule by
adding, …in which case play shall continue as normal and
resulting play with the puck shall be deemed a legitimate
play unless the next stoppage of play is created by the
scoring of a goal in which case video review shall
disallow the goal and reset the clock to the time the
puck exited the playing surface by hitting the spectator
netting. An application of this nature would be
consistent with rule 78.6 when a team scores an apparent
goal that is not seen by the on-ice officials and play
continues, the play shall be reviewed by the Video Goal
Judge at the next stoppage of play. If the goal is
confirmed by video review, the clock (including penalty
time clocks, if applicable) is re-set to the time the
goal was scored. Any potential goal requiring video
review must be reviewed prior to or during the next
stoppage of play. No goal may be awarded (or disallowed)
as a result of video review once the puck has been
dropped and play has resumed. Video review is provided
much broader discretion in determining the legitimacy of
all potential goals. They even recently extended the
authority granted to them within the above rule by
placing a play under review following a puck drop and
resumption of play after Carey Price had made a goal line
save. The decision to add the terminology to their
criteria, puck directed into the goal as an immediate
result of hitting the spectator netting would appear to
be another extension of this broad discretion and
authority. It might be prudent for the NHL Public
Relations Department to communicate these changes to the
hockey world before they take effect. It is only
reasonable to expect that everyone, especially the hockey
broadcasters, would like to clearly understand what
defines a good hockey goal?
Friday-Donald-Penn-Jersey/">Donald Penn Jersey .
Toronto announced the deal with the restricted free agent
on Saturday. The terms were not disclosed.
Friday-Ej-Manuel-Jersey/">E. J. Manuel Jersey .
Rasmussen didnt have a decision during his four
appearances in May, when he gave up two hits and no runs
in two innings. Toronto used five relievers while pulling
off the second-biggest comeback in franchise history on
Friday night, rallying from an 8-0 deficit to a 14-9 win.
Friday-Art-Shell-
Jersey/">http://www.authenticraidersfansclub.com/Black-
Friday-Art-Shell-Jersey/ . The Pope greeted Klose
at his general audience Wednesday and the pair had a long
chat. Klose is German like the pope, although he was born
in Poland. In Sundays derby, Lazio took the lead in the
seventh minute after Maarten Stekelenburg brought down
Klose, resulting in the Roma goalkeeper being sent off
and a penalty that Hernanes converted.As NHL teams
prepare for training camp in September, a lot of the
hockey talk always revolves around new faces we may see
opening night. For the Jets, one of the names that kept
popping up was Adam Lowry. There was a spot up front and
he was going to be given the opportunity to grab it. Adam
approached camp with this in mind: When you come in, you
know how many guys are coming back and whenever a team
doesnt make the playoffs, you know there is going to be a
chance they are going to be willing to make changes. So
as long as I pushed and I showed well, I knew Id have a
chance to push my way into the lineup. Lowry had a very
good second half with the St. Johns IceCaps in their run
to the Calder Cup final last sprng. It was also an
opportunity for Kevin Cheveldayoff, Craig Heisinger, Paul
Maurice and the rest of the Jets management group to get
a real good look at him in pressure situations. But
knowing who was watching was not the focus. We were
focussed on winning the Calder Cup. It was disappointing
to lose. For me in the developmental stage, going through
that was huge. Playoffs is another level. To be able to
do that, it was a short summer but a lot of valuable
experience was gained. At 65 and 207 lbs, the 21-year-old
has the size to be able to compete in the tough Western
Conference. He also has the pedigree, with his father
Dave having played 1,084 NHL regular season games. And
when the Jets made him their second selection in the 2011
draft, family was part of it. Dave was well respected,
both as a player and a person, said Marcel Comeau,
Director of Amateur Scouting for the Jets. We were
hopeful the apple didnt fall too far from the tree and
that has certainly come to pass. When it came to making
the selection, there was no debate, continued Comeau. We
had him and another player in mind, a player that went a
few picks earlier. When that guy went, Adam was our guy.
We liked his size, his effort, physical play, his two-way
game and he led by example. He was a little raw at that
point, but we felt he had big upside. In the 2008 Western
Hockey League bantam draft, a VERY much smaller Lowry
(59, 135 lbs) did not go until the fourth round, 78th
overall, taken by the Swift Current Broncos, a place
where he grew both on the ice and off the ice. I went to
my first camp at 15, I measured in at 511, 141 lbs, and
started my first junior year at 61 1/2. They gave me 163
but I was probably 150-155 lbs. He went on to being named
WHL Player of the Year after scoring 45 goals and 43
assists for 88 points in the 2012-13 season. Lowry was
born in St. Louis where his dad was playing with the
Blues. We were only there nine months and Dad got picked
up by Florida in the expansion draft. There until I think
five and we moved to San Jose until I was eight and then
Calgary ever since. I remember the first time in Calgary,
it snowed first week of September and I was terrified.
Lowry learned plenty from hiis dad, and from just being
around the game.
Friday-Jared-Cook-Jersey/">Jared Cook Jersey. Dad
had to go to the rink and work hard every day. He was
never guaranteed a spot. He was always on the third and
fourth lines and always battling with someone else to
stay in the lineup. I saw how hard he worked in the
summer and how hard he worked during the season. Even
when he was injured he would be in the gym and doing
everything he could to get back into the lineup. Hes been
huge help. Adam also learned by just hanging around and
watching. You pick up things that a lot of people dont if
you are not around it. Id watch practices, and at a young
age, you are watching some of your heroes but you are
also watching coaches implement systems and at eight,
nine, 10-years-old, you are starting to understand things
that are not being taught until 13, 14. It really helps
you push your hockey sense to another level at a young
age. Lowry is a perfect example for the Jets plan of
draft and develop. As general manager Kevin Cheveldayoff
put it to Tim Campbell of the Winnipeg Free Press the
morning of Lowrys first NHL game, opening night in
Arizona, Its something that when we set out on this trek,
this journey from Atlanta to Winnipeg, we knew the
process and the painstaking way we were going to have to
build the franchise. So when you draft a player and he
goes through the process, the gratifying thing to me
personally is that youre not really doing it, its the way
the organization is set up, the people youve entrusted to
do their jobs. You know the prospects are in good hands,
but at the end of the day, its up to the prospect. They
have to take possession of their own career and Adam has
certainly done that. There is an interesting connection
with teammates T.J. Galiardi and Paul Postma. Dave Lowry
coached the two when they played for the Calgary Hitmen
of the WHL. For Postma and Galiardi to make hockey
comparisons is not possible, but there are similarities
in personality. Both have a lighthearted, dry sense of
humor, stated Galiardi. Dave ripped me a few times when
he coached me, Adam hasnt ripped me – yet. He added
jokingly. Postma notices how both love to compete. They
both hate to lose, very competitive. On the ice, Lowry
has been moved from left wing to centre because that is
where Coach Paul Maurice sees him playing long-term.
Lowry grew up a winger, but was moved to centre for his
final year of junior and also played the middle last
year. Biggest adjustment to the NHL, pace, stated Lowry.
Everything happens quicker. Lowrys first NHL goal came on
a deflection in the sixth game of the season. It turned
out to be the winner in the Jets first home win of the
year. Every game, he seems more comfortable starting a
road trip on a line with Chris Thorburn and Dustin
Byfuglien. And the final word will go to Byfuglien, He is
fun to watch. Keeps it simple and doesnt want to get out
of his comfort zone, but I cant wait until he does.
Cheap
Jerseys From China
Wholesale
Authentic Jerseys
Che
ap NFL Jerseys Authentic
Jerseys NFL
Cheap
Cheap NFL
Jerseys
Wholesale Nike NFL
Jerseys China
Jerseys Cheap ' ' '
|
Aktif Konular 
Üye Listesi 
Arama 
Yardım
Kayıt Ol 
Giriş
Gitar-tr.com FORUM : Gitar-tr.com Tanisma Toplantisi !!!
Konu: Got a question on rule clarification, com
