Gitar-tr.com Reklam Vermek için Tıklayınız...

  Aktif KonularAktif Konular  Forum Üyelerini GösterÜye Listesi  Forumu AraArama  YardımYardım
  Kayıt OlKayıt Ol  GirişGiriş
Gitar-tr.com Tanisma Toplantisi !!!
 Gitar-tr.com FORUM : Gitar-tr.com Tanisma Toplantisi !!!
Konu Konu: Got a question on rule clarification, com Yanıt YazYeni Konu Gönder
Yazanlarda
Mesaj << Önceki Konu | Sonraki Konu >>
jokergreen0220
Kidemli Üye
Kidemli Üye


Kayıt Tarihi: 2017-20-Aralik
Aktif Durum: Pasif
Gönderilenler: 0
Gönderen: 2018-23-Subat Saat 09:19 | Kayıtlı IP Alıntı jokergreen0220

Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule
enforcements or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants
to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.
burnett-jersey/">Morgan Burnett Jersey .ca. Hi
Kerry, So Shawn Thornton gets a slap on the wrist for the
water squirting incident - a childish, unsportsmanlike
and potentially dangerous act, but players can get two
minutes for spraying the goalie with snow when sometimes
inadvertently just trying to stop quickly? In your
opinion, should the NHL ever consider taking a more
serious look at such actions and add them as an
infraction in the rule book? Mike Cimba Mike: The Player
Safety Committee should be commended for their swift
action to impose the maximum permitted fine under the CBA
($2,820.52) against Shawn Thornton for his childish,
television viewer unsightly, unsportsmanlike and
potentially dangerous act of water bottle squirting at PK
Subban. I am quite sure an incident of this nature will
never happen again given the maximum allowable
supplementary discipline and public humiliation that has
been imposed against Thornton (sic sarcasm intended). Now
that this bug on the visor of Subban has been wiped clean
and severely dealt with, perhaps the PSC, Hockey
Operations and the Officiating Department can focus their
attention on more important issues that have been
continually exposed to this point in the playoffs? For
starters Mike, additional rules dont need to written
until the ones that already exist are more consistently
enforced; or even just applied. If the referee determined
that Subban had been legitimately interfered with by a
spray from a water bottle in Thorntons hands (Heaven
forbid) the ref could have applied a broad interpretation
to rule 56.2: a minor penalty shall be imposed on any
identifiable player on the players bench or penalty bench
who, by means of his stick or his body, interferes with
the movements of the puck or any opponent on the ice
during the progress of the play (Thorntons hands are
attached to his body). Likewise, the same rule 75 -
unsportsmanlike conduct, that is applied (sometimes)
against a player deemed guilty of deliberately snow-
showering a goalie could also be imposed in the case of a
player deliberately squirting water in the face of his
opponent. With the multitude of infractions that are
being let go throughout extended portions of these games
I cant imagine any referee imposing a penalty for this
squirt of liquid. With regard to player safety however,
it appears to be a serious and unwanted element of the
game. So too was diving/embellishment once upon a time.
Embellishment was deemed a plague within the game and
language was added to rule 64.3 that provided authority
for Hockey Operations to review game videos and assess
fines to players who dive or embellish a fall or a
reaction, or who feign injury regardless if a penalty was
called on the ice. The punishment for the first such
offence during the season will result in a warning letter
being sent to the player. The second such incident will
result in a $1,000 fine. For the third such incident in
the season, the player shall be suspended for one game,
pending a telephone conversation with the Director of
Hockey Operations. For subsequent violations in the same
season, the players suspension shall double (i.e. first
suspension - one game, second suspension - two games,
third suspension - four games, etc.) When was the last
time you read that a player had been fined for
diving/embellishment let alone suspended? I have seen
some known offenders embellish as many as three times in
one game during these playoffs. Im not suggesting for a
second that players should be suspended for the letter of
the law that this rule empowers Hockey Operations. What I
am suggesting is to focus on the real important issues
beyond a squirt from a water bottle. Lets start with an
acceptable and expected standard of enforcement from the
referees throughout a playoff game that is more
consistent with those employed during the regular season.
The rulebook has not changed from the regular season but
the application and standard of enforcement by most of
the referees clearly has. Powerful stick slashes that
broke a players stick was almost always called; as the
playoffs progress they are seldom called and have even
resulted in goals being scored. Obvious infractions have
been let go; major infractions have been let go or deemed
to be a minor penalty. The latest such example was the
major boarding infraction by Brandon Bollig on Keith
Ballard that was deemed to be a minor penalty by the
referee on the ice. Bollig was subsequently and correctly
suspended for two games by the Player Safety Committee
for this dangerous hit that injured Ballard. As far as I
am concerned they got in wrong by not responding in kind
to the chicken-wing elbow delivered by Jared Spurgeon of
the Wild to the head of Marcus Kruger. Kruger was pulling
his upper body back and up after shooting the puck on
goal. Spurgeon was going to miss his intended check and
responded by leaving his skates and extending his elbow
to initiate contact with the head of Kruger. Kruger
staggered of the ice and went directly to be evaluated in
the quiet of the Hawks dressing room. Spearing incidents
and howdy-dos between the legs have on occasion resulted
in the assessment of penalties. Sidney Crosby provided a
pretty good howdy to Dominic Moore that went un-penalized
and resulted in a scrum at the end of the second period
in yesterdays Rangers 3-1 win over the Penguins. In an
attempt to keep all things in perspective, it would
appear that a squirt off the bench with a water bottle
will result in the maximum allowable fine being levied by
the Player Safety Committee. Perhaps just a letter to
Thornton would have sufficed; all things being equal?
rollins-jersey/">Quinten Rollins Jersey . PAUL,
Minn. evans-jersey/">Jahri Evans Jersey .C. -- Panthers
offensive tackle Jordan Gross is saying goodbye to the
NFL after 11 seasons.
jersey/">http://www.officialpackersteamgears.com/kyle-
murphy-jersey/
. -- Creighton apparently has
Villanovas number.The Ottawa Senators made a low-risk
investment, both in terms of picks and contract, in an
effort to boost their offence. Numbers Game looks at the
Senators getting Ales Hemsky from the Edmonton Oilers for
a pair of draft picks. The Senators Get: RW Ales Hemsky.
Hemsky, 30, is not the two-time 70-point scorer that he
was earlier in his career, but there are some factors
working in his favour, at least in terms of producing
more offensively. For one thing, he has good possession
numbers while facing high-quality opposition and starting
an unsually-low (43.9%) percentage of his shifts in the
offensive zone. If the Senators plug Hemskys playmaking
skill alongside Jason Spezza and Milan Michalek, that
would have to be considered a much better situation for
an offensive player than Hemskys role in Edmonton this
year, where his most common centre was checker Boyd
Gordon. The Senators are in tough to try and get into the
playoffs -- four points out with 20 games remaining --
but its not impossible and adding Hemsky does give them a
decent chance to have a second productive scoring line.
Perhaps the real coup of the deal for the Senators is
that they convinced the Oilers to retain half of Hemskys
salary and while thats not a huge deal for a pending
unrestricted free agent, it makes for a cheap addition of
a top six forward. Thhe Oilers Get: A fifth-round pick
and 2015 third-round pick.
randall-jersey/">Damarious Randall Jersey. The net
return on this deal is remarkably little for the Oilers.
Cumulatively, a fifth and third-round pick brings
approximately a 36% chance of landing an NHL player, and
that player is likely not going to be in the league for
three or four years, at least. Its one thing to roll the
dice on a few picks, but to also pick up half of Hemskys
cap hit is a tad generous, but this is likely a function
of how the Oilers have used Hemsky this season. If he was
played in an offensive role throughout the year and put
up points, there would be greater demand for his services
which would obviously bring a better return. Since Hemsky
was effectively playing on the Oilers third line, there
is room to plug in the likes of Ryan Jones or Jesse
Joensuu to fill the spot. Presumably there will be an
attempt in the offseason to find a more suitable top nine
forward to fill the void created by Hemskys departure. In
any case, the Hemsky Era in Edmonton is over, after 477
points in 652 games, and hes going to have a decent shot
to rehabilitate his offensive image before hitting free
agency in the summer. Scott Cullen can be reached at
[email protected] and followed on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/tsnscottcullen. For more, check out
TSN Fantasy on Facebook.
Cheap
NFL Jerseys

Wholes
ale Jerseys

Wh
olesale NFL Jerseys

Jersey
s From China

Wholesale
NFL Jerseys

Cheap NFL
Jerseys

Cheap
Jerseys
' ' '
Yukarı Dön Göster jokergreen0220's Özellikler Diğer Mesajlarını Ara: jokergreen0220
 

Eğer Bu Konuya Cevap Yazmak İstiyorsanız İlk Önce Giriş
Eğer Kayıtlı Bir Kullanıcı Değilseniz İlk Önce Kayıt Olmalısınız

  Yanıt YazYeni Konu Gönder
Yazıcı Sürümü Yazıcı Sürümü

Forum Atla
Kapalı Foruma Yeni Konu Gönderme
Kapalı Forumdaki Konulara Cevap Yazma
Kapalı Forumda Cevapları Silme
Kapalı Forumdaki Cevapları Düzenleme
Kapalı Forumda Anket Açma
Kapalı Forumda Anketlerde Oy Kullanma

Copyright ©1998-2006 
Gitar-tr.com
Design And Coded By ZezeroN Tech



Bu Sayfa 0.1250 Saniyede Yüklendi.